Scrambler Mid II WP vs Scrambler Low EV: Which to Pick
By Barefoot Shoes | Minimalist Footwear | Xero Shoes | Published: 2026-10-14
Category: Comparisons
Compare the Scrambler Mid II WP and Scrambler Low EV on waterproofing, ankle coverage, and weight to decide which Xero Shoes hiker fits your trails.
Quick answer
Choose the Scrambler Mid II WP if you want a waterproof mid-height boot with ankle coverage for wet, rugged hikes. Choose the Scrambler Low EV if you prefer a lighter, breathable low-cut shoe for dry, fast trails. Both share Michelin Fiberlite outsoles and zero drop.
Waterproofing and ankle coverage
The Scrambler Mid II WP features a 100% waterproof internal membrane and a mid-height cut that covers your ankle. That makes it the better choice for stream crossings, muddy trails, or cold rain. The Scrambler Low EV has no waterproof membrane; its abrasion-resistant mesh upper is breathable and moisture-wicking, so it dries faster but won't keep water out. If your hikes often involve wet conditions, the Mid II WP is the clear pick. For dry, warm-weather trails, the Low EV's ventilation keeps feet cooler.
Weight and agility
The Low EV is lighter and more agile, thanks to its low-cut design and breathable mesh. The Mid II WP is also described as lightweight and breathable, but the added height and waterproof membrane add some bulk. On technical terrain where ankle articulation matters, the Low EV feels less restrictive. On rocky, uneven ground where you want a bit more protection, the Mid II WP's higher cut offers a sense of security.
Outsole and traction
Both shoes use a flexible Michelin Fiberlite sole, so you get similar grip and ground feel. The Mid II WP's sole is designed for hiking and outdoor adventures, while the Low EV's outsole is described as lightweight and rugged. Neither shoe compromises on the minimalist, zero-drop platform that Xero Shoes is known for. If you prioritize traction on varied terrain, both deliver, but the Mid II WP may have a slight edge in sloppy conditions due to its waterproof build.
Trade-offs to weigh
- Waterproofing vs breathability: The Mid II WP's waterproof membrane blocks water but also reduces airflow, so feet may sweat more. The Low EV's mesh is highly breathable but offers no water resistance. Pick waterproofing if wet trails are common; pick breathability if you hike in dry heat.
- Ankle support vs freedom of movement: The Mid II WP's mid-height cut supports the ankle but can feel restrictive on agile moves. The Low EV's low cut allows full ankle articulation but less protection. Choose based on whether you prioritize stability or natural motion.
- Weight and packability: The Low EV is lighter and easier to pack, while the Mid II WP is slightly heavier due to its added height and membrane. For fastpacking or travel, the Low EV saves weight; for rugged day hikes, the Mid II WP's extra ounces are worth it.
Key product facts
- Scrambler Mid II WP - Women: 100% waterproof internal membrane Keeps feet dry in rain, mud, and stream crossings, making it suitable for wet hikes.
- Scrambler Mid II WP - Women: Mid-height boot style for hiking and outdoor use Provides ankle coverage and support on uneven terrain, reducing the risk of twists.
- Scrambler Low EV - Men: Abrasion and debris resistant mesh upper Durable against trail debris while allowing airflow, so feet stay cooler on dry hikes.
- Scrambler Low EV - Men: Breathable and moisture-wicking Helps manage sweat and dries quickly, ideal for warm-weather or high-intensity hikes.
Which should you choose?
Best for
- Hikers who frequently encounter wet, muddy, or snowy conditions
- Those who want ankle coverage and support on rocky, uneven trails
- Hikers prioritizing waterproof protection over breathability
Not for
- Hikers on dry, hot trails who need maximum ventilation
- Minimalists who want the lightest possible shoe for fast hikes
- Those who prefer a low-cut shoe for unrestricted ankle movement
